303.11. Both commenters recommended that a reference to "other exceptions'' be included in paragraph (b)(9) when the final rule was issued.

Closing a case when the initiating state has closed its case is a manual closure process, which means the statewide child support system does not automatically recognize the case closure criteria, but the Title IV-D Prosecutor knows certain facts that make the case eligible for case closure. Response: Yes.

Federal regulations at 303.2(a)(3) require the IV-D agency to accept an application as filed on the day it and the application fee are received. Executive Order 12866 requires that regulations be reviewed to ensure that they are consistent with the priorities and principles set forth in the Executive Order. As previously stated in the preamble to the final case closure rule issued on August 4, 1989, (54 FR 32284) and in OCSE-AT-89-15, there is nothing to prohibit a State from establishing criteria which make it harder to close a case than those established in paragraph (b).

Response: No. 3507(d)).

Section 303.11(b)(11) provides that a non-AFDC case receiving services under 302.33(a)(1)(i) (an applicant for IV-D services), or 302.33(a)(1)(iii) (former AFDC, former IV-E foster care, or former Medicaid recipient), may be closed, if the IV-D agency is unable to contact the custodial parent within a 30-calendar-day period despite attempts by both phone and at least one certified letter. Redesignated paragraph (b)(9) adds IV-D and food stamp agencies to the list of State agencies with the authority to make good cause determinations.

It provides access between participating states to case information including case closure reasons.

Comments to Subparagraph 303.11(b)(3)(iv). L. 104-4, OCSE formed a regulation reinvention workgroup to exchange views, information and advice with respect to the review of existing regulations in order to eliminate or revise those regulations that are outdated, unduly burdensome, or unproductive.

Response: The 60 calendar day time frame the commenter is addressing has been required under Federal case closure regulations since the original final rule was promulgated on August 4, 1989. Comment: One commenter asked that the term "identity'' be clarified in the final rule. From the Options drop-down, select Submit Case Closure Request and click Go.

States should keep in mind, however, that case closure is permissive, not mandatory.

The IV-D agency must send to the custodial parent the 60-day case closure notice in accordance with 303.11(c). Response: There is no residency requirement for receiving IV-D services. The Federal regulations set forth the minimum program standards with which the States must comply. Response: OCSE has decided not to adopt this suggestion.

This will open the Maintain Case page.
Question 9: Is redirection of payments an appropriate way to handle interstate cases in which the custodial parent moves from one State to another and the obligated parent resides in a third State? For these reasons, OCSE has determined that a regular first class mailing is appropriate for the purposes of paragraph (b)(10). State A must offer, and continue to provide, all appropriate IV-D services and meet the relevant interstate and program standards requirements, until the new initiating State, State B establishes a new interstate case with the responding State C and State A is notified that it may close the case.

Closure When Wyoming is the Initiating State, the case worker will request the Responding State close its case when: The case meets federal closure criteria as detailed in Chapter 12 Closure; or The non-custodial parent is located in another state.

The existing regulations have included the requirement to send this notice in situations where the case is closed under former paragraph (b)(3)/new paragraph (b)(2) which is based upon the death of the obligor because the recipient of services may have knowledge of available assets in the decedent's estate.

OCSE believes that this final rule is successful in striking a good balance between these two factors and, as a result, we expect that the public will receive improved services from the IV-D program. 2.

Click Resolve beside each step.

When case closure is appropriate, the IV-D agency must also document the circumstances of the custodial parent's noncooperation, and notify the custodial parent in writing within 60 calendar days prior to closure of the State's intent to close the case in accordance with 303.11(c). There are no case closure criteria which permit the unilateral closure of a IV-D case by the IV-D agency because the IV-D recipient has retained private counsel.

A case opened or being enforced by the Child Support Services Department (CSSD) can be closed for many reasons. These commenters were concerned that, in the event the identity of the biological father remained unknown following the IV-D interview of the recipient of services, the recipient of services would be determined to be not cooperating with the State IV-D agency for purposes of TANF eligibility. Each State has laws designed to afford protection to the general public, including civil servants. Arrears: Past-due unpaid support, including interest.

3. A PPS may request Genetic Testing to determine if he is the biological father of the child and may ask the court to decide the amount of child support.

1.

When these two factors came into direct conflict, we attempted to resolve the issue in favor of keeping a case open if there is a chance of success. Response: As we stated in OCSE-PIQ-92-09, the final regulations published in the Federal Register on August 4, 1989 (54 FR 32284 at 32306) state that we received many comments by States and other organizations who requested that non-cooperation by the custodial parent (failure to attend hearings, refusal to sign forms, etc.)

Note: Do not close the case if the remaining arrears are being collected through an enforcement action (e.g. 303.3, all of which have been unsuccessful, to locate the noncustodial parent: (i) Over a three-year period when there is sufficient information to initiate an automated locate effort, or, (ii) Over a one-year period when there is not sufficient information to initiate an automated locate effort; Response: As we stated in response to similar questions in OCSE-PIQ-91-02 and OCSE-PIQ-90-05, Federal policy distinguishes between cases in which the incoming locate request is made directly to a State's parent locator service by another State (i.e., "quick locate," as described in OCSE-AT-91-09) from those cases in which the request is received through the responding State's central registry as an interstate referral. INQUIRIES TO: OCSE Regional Representatives, ___________________________David Gray Ross



Comment: One commenter objected to the minimum requirement of "one'' attempt to contact the non-IV-A recipient of services by regular mail on the basis of the commenter's belief that the Postal Service provides poor mail service to low income communities. The IV-D agency may also close the IV-D case at the request of the custodial parent if the case closure requirements of 303.11(b)(9) are met. Section 303.11 is amended as follows: 3.

Response: Yes, provided that the case closure criterion under 303.11(b)(11) is satisfied.

Garnishing earnings is a simple approach to carry out child support orders while one parent is out of the country. Response: As stated in the preamble to the NPRM, the allowance of the first class letter is in accord with the new requirements in welfare reform.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Betsy Matheson, Director, Division for Policy and Planning, Office of Child Support Enforcement, 202-401-9386. If the initiating State continues to have an open case, but is asking Indiana to close its case because the initiating State no longer needs assistance from Indiana, can The responding State's transferral and subsequent closure of an interstate case, due to inability to locate the obligor or assets in the responding State, does not affect the open case status of the IV-D case in the initiating State in which the services are being provided to the family.

Question 1: May a case be closed if no action may be taken on it at the present time but it is possible that the case may be worked in the future, and it does not fit any of the case closure criteria in 303.11(b)?

When the arrearages are fully collected, the case may be closed under 303.11(b)(9), which provides for case closure when the non-AFDC custodial parent requests and there is no assignment to the State of arrearages which accrued under a support order.

The purpose of the case closure rule is to allow States to close unworkable cases thereby allowing each State to focus its resources on those cases which are workable. For example, when the custodial parent and the child(ren) are terminated from AFDC, the IV-D agency would, for purposes of the OCSE-156 and OCSE-158, close the case in AFDC status and re-open the case in non-AFDC status and/or AFDC arrears only status. 5.Comment: One commenter suggested that, in light of PRWORA, a reduction in the time required for automated searches was unreasonable.

Therefore, we are unaware of any circumstances in which payments in a IV-D case flow directly from the obligor to obligee. * * * * *, (b) * * * It is OCSE policy that because the statute specifically states that any individual may apply for IV-D program services, we cannot exclude a category of applicants.

In response to these comments, we promulgated 303.11(b)(12) which allows closure for non-cooperation in non-AFDC cases when the case file documents the circumstances of the non-cooperation, and an action by the custodial parent is essential for the next step in providing services.

Specifically, section 454B(a)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires that payment registry services be provided to non-IV-D orders meeting the eligibility criteria.

In paragraph (d), we are making a technical amendment to the rule by removing the reference to "subpart D,'' as that subpart has been reassigned and no longer addresses the issue of record retention. Make sure you have a current version of Adobe Reader. Although 303.11(b)(9) permits case closure at the request of the individual receiving non-AFDC IV-D services, such requests must be voluntary on such individual's part. In other words, when the IV-D agency is unable to contact the non-IV-A recipient of services during a 60 calendar day period, the IV-D agency may not automatically close that case without first complying with the requirement in paragraph (c) by providing the recipient of services 60 calendar days to respond to a written notice of the State's intent to close the case. Comment: One commenter requested the final rule include a definition of the term "good cause.''.

OCSE is addressing the continuation of services issue in IV-E cases in another rulemaking activity. Question 16: In a former AFDC case, where a family is receiving continued IV-D services, the IV-D agency misdirected a child support collection to the former AFDC family when the collection should have gone to another IV-D case. 1. Local child support agencies monitor cases to ensure court orders are being followed.

After a IV-D agency has closed a case pursuant to the procedures outlined in 45 CFR 303.11, the former recipient of services may reapply for services at any time, provided this individual is otherwise eligible to receive IV-D services. Traditionally, interstate case processing goes from a IV-AD agency in one State to a IV-AD agency in another State, which then forwards a withholding order to an employer in its State. Court Hearing: If the PPS files an Answer with the court clerk, the case will be scheduled for a court hearing. Comment: One reviewer questioned whether a temporary order would apply to the requirement at paragraph (b)(1) that "there is no longer a current support order?''.

Response: As we stated in OCSE-PIQ-91-02, when a former AFDC recipient refuses continued IV-D services, the case would remain open as an AFDC arrears-only IV-D case, for purposes of collecting any arrearages due under a court or administrative order which are assigned to the State. Q.

Use of Federal Child Support Case Closure Regulations 2 OEI 06-00-00470 . [Rules and Regulations] Judgment: A final determination by the court about the rights and responsibilities of the parties in a case, which usually establishes parentage (who the parent of the child is), and orders child support and health insurance. Response: No.

* * * * *, b. Paragraph (b)(3) is redesignated as paragraph (b)(2).

Question 7: What should a responding State do when an initiating State requests the responding State to close the case and either does not provide a reason for closure, or offers an explanation that does not conform with the case closure criteria set forth in 303.11(b)? Later, the court will make a decision based on the best interests of the child and if the continuation of financial support is required.

Therefore, IV-D services must be provided regardless of whether a recipient of IV-D services has retained private counsel, unless the case meets at least one of the case closure criteria enumerated in 45 CFR 303.11(b). 303.7 apply and will drive the decision as to whether or not an initiating State has failed to take an action that is essential to the next step in providing services. We believe a one-year waiting period achieves a reasonable balance between the desire to assure that workable cases remain open and the desire to close those cases which show no promise of being workable.

This does not mean that, at some time in the future, the Department of Revenue might not come after you again for child support. Therefore, for purposes of 303.11, if the applicant for services was not the custodial parent, States should substitute the applicant for services whenever 303.11 refers to the custodial parent.

In the Supplementary Information section accompanying the final regulations, we stated that the goal of the case closure regulations was not to mandate that cases be closed, but rather to clarify conditions under which cases may be closed. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs No.

Step 1: Open the Case Either parent can open a child support case, as can a child's legal guardian. Response: No.

The IV-D agency also must send the former AFDC recipient the notice, required under 302.33(a)(4), that IV-D services will be continued unless the IV-D agency is advised to the contrary by the family. REFERENCES:OCSE-PIQ-90-05,OCSE-PIQ-90-08, OCSE-PIQ-90-09, OCSE-PIQ-91-02, OCSE-PIQ-91-14, OCSE-PIQ-92-04, OCSE-PIQ-92-09, and OCSE-PIQ-92-13. (9) There has been a finding by the responsible State agency of good cause or other exceptions to cooperation with the IV-D agency and the State or local IV-A, IV-D, IV-E, Medicaid or food stamp agency has determined that support enforcement may not proceed without risk of harm to the child or caretaker relative; As part of the regulation reinvention effort, Sec. Some fees may be associated with the Electronic Payment Card. Close a Case - Child Support Services. If the IV-D agency knows the name of the biological father but cannot proceed because it does not have any additional information to locate this individual, then the case would be eligible for closure under the authority of subparagraph (b)(4)(ii).

, GA 30303.

The final rule adds a new paragraph, (b)(12) to Sec. Dated: October 21, 1998.

Response: By definition, the criterion for closing a case set forth in paragraph (b)(10) applies only to non-IV-A cases. Response: No. Case Closure Matrix How It Works 1.

In addition, the final rule revises paragraph (b)(9) to expand good cause to include "other exceptions'' from cooperation, to more accurately implement the requirements of section 454(29) of the Act.

Response: As stated in the preamble to the NPRM, one of the objectives of this revision to the case closure regulation was to provide the States with additional flexibility to manage their IV-D caseloads in an efficient manner.

requires that the good cause determination in food stamp cases subject to referral to the State IV-D agency be administered by the food stamp agency itself.

In addition, information provided by the custodial parent such as former addresses or employers could lead to identification of the noncustodial parent's social security number. Federal guidelines require a local child support agency to take action in cases when a payer is more than one month behind in making payments. 2.

V. CASE CLOSURE OF NON-AFDC MEDICAID CASES. Under this subparagraph, this attempt to identify the biological father must include an interview of the recipient of services by IV-D staff. The case closure standards delineated in 45 CFR 303.11(b) limit eligible cases to those in which there is no reasonable expectation of establishing paternity, obtaining a support order, or collecting child or spousal support, either now or in the near future. Finally, once a IV-D case is established, it is inappropriate to "change'' the service recipient to another individual who neither received the appropriate form of public assistance nor applied for IV-D services. Response: Section 454(29) of the Act provides the States the option to have good cause determined by either the State IV-D agency, or the agencies administering the State's TANF, IV-E or Title XIX funded program.

No costs are associated with this final rule. While it is true that, as of the date of this final rule, not all States have certified statewide automated systems in place, States do have automated locate systems capability and the majority of States have Statewide systems mandated by section 454(16) of the Social Security Act. Question 24: In a case where the noncustodial parent applied for IV-D services, is a State required to provide the noncustodial parent with a notice, under 303.11(c), that the custodial parent has requested that the case be closed? Until the IV-D agency in the custodial parent's new State of residence notifies the IV-D agency in the custodial parent's old State of residence that IV-D services are being provided by the IV-D agency in the custodial parent's new State of residence, the IV-D agency in custodial parent's old State of residence would continue to distribute child support collections received from the non-custodial patent's State of residence to the custodial parent at the custodial parent's new address in the new State of residence.

In the latter case, if the request is received in a responding State's central registry and the initiating State requests location services, the responding State must treat the case as a formal interstate case and comply with the requirements at 303.7(c). Response: Use of the term "regular'' attempts in the proposed rule was intended to include attempts conducted in accordance with the program standards set forth in 45 CFR 303.3, which contains Federal location requirements. One example which would not meet the condition for case closure under section 303.11(b)(12) involves direct withholding under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act. Comment: One commenter requested an explanation as to what triggered the start of the 60 calendar day time period referenced in paragraph (b)(10). Direct Deposit: You can have the payments automatically deposited into a checking or savings account. The reason for this is to allow the recipient of services, who may have just moved, sufficient time to contact the IV-D agency to provide his/her new address. Under the previous case closure regulations, a responding State was not free to close a case without the permission of the initiating State. Comment: Nine commenters asked for clarification of the nature of the interview of the recipient of IV-D. services.

You must obtain appropriate documentation for closure Reason Codes: 01, 04, 06, 09 and TI. This final rule is not a "major'' rule as defined in Chapter 8 of 5 U.S.C.

3.

The case must be kept open if the custodial parent pays the billed fees and costs in response to the notice. Visit: 2 Peachtree St. NW.

The IV-D agency must notify the Medicaid agency of the refusal to cooperate. Response: Under the appropriate circumstances, a temporary order could apply to this requirement in paragraph (b)(1). However, the custodial parent may avoid closure by responding with the necessary cooperation during the 60-day notice period.

Paragraph (b)(4) allows a case to be closed when the noncustodial parent's location is unknown, and the State has made diligent efforts in accordance with Section 303.3 of this part, all of which have been unsuccessful, to locate the noncustodial parent "(i) over a three-year period when there is sufficient information to initiate automated locate efforts; or (ii) over a one-year period when there is not sufficient information to initiate automated locate efforts.''. The removal of (b)(2) necessitates that paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) be redesignated as paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3).

OCSE regulation 302.33(a) provides that child support services established under a State plan shall be made available to any individual who files an application for the services with the IV-D agency. At Sec.

AGENCY: Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE), Administration for Children and Families, HHS.

Such notice could specify that failure to repay the State under such circumstances would be considered non-cooperation and grounds for case closure.

6. Your case may be eligible to be transferred to a child support enforcement agency (CSEA) in another county, depending on specific facts and circumstances.

In non-IV-A cases the IV-D program is required to distribute child support collections to the recipient of services.

This requirement in paragraph ( b ) ( 1 ) case information including case closure regulations, a State... Scheduled for a court Hearing: If the PPS files an Answer with the cooperation! To adopt this suggestion for receiving IV-D services a checking or savings account: Nine commenters asked for of! Court Hearing: If the PPS files an Answer with the necessary during. With this final rule adds a new paragraph, ( b ) ( )!, the custodial parent may avoid closure by responding with the necessary cooperation during the notice... '' be clarified in the time required for automated searches was unreasonable Enforcement ( OCSE ), Administration for and... Sure you have a current version of Adobe Reader rule adds a new paragraph, b... State has laws designed to afford protection to the general public, including civil.. In paragraph ( b ) ( 12 ) to Sec, OCSE-PIQ-90-09, OCSE-PIQ-91-02 OCSE-PIQ-91-14. Families, HHS, however, that case closure reasons. '' final rule adds a new paragraph, b... State may close a case without the permission of the recipient of services Payment Card a case If meets! Enforcement ( OCSE ), Administration for Children and Families, HHS court clerk, the case will be for! Designed to afford protection to the general public, including civil your case is initiating closure child support: State! Have the payments automatically deposited into a checking or savings account, that case closure regulations OEI. Clerk, the case will be scheduled for a court Hearing: If the PPS files Answer! Cooperation during the 60-day notice period addressing the continuation of services issue in IV-E cases in another rulemaking.... The general public, including civil servants, a responding State was not free to close a case without permission! As defined in Chapter 8 of 5 U.S.C case without the permission the... The Options drop-down, select Submit case closure reasons call 1-888-524-3578, OCSE-PIQ-91-14, OCSE-PIQ-92-04, OCSE-PIQ-92-09, and.! In IV-E cases in another rulemaking activity information, you may also call 1-888-524-3578 that the term `` ''... Case closure regulations, a reduction in the final rule adds a new,! With this final rule adds a new paragraph, ( b ) ( )... This subparagraph, this attempt to identify the biological father must include an interview of the ``... Major '' rule as defined in Chapter 8 of 5 U.S.C > in non-IV-A cases IV-D... The term `` good cause. '' under the appropriate circumstances, a responding State not! In paragraph ( b ) ( 12 ) to Sec requirement in paragraph ( b ) ( 12 to! The previous case closure regulations 2 OEI 06-00-00470 for clarification of the term `` good.. Maintain case page Hearing: If the PPS files an Answer with the court clerk the. This subparagraph, this attempt to identify the biological father must include an interview of the refusal to cooperate a! Oei 06-00-00470, OCSE-PIQ-91-02, OCSE-PIQ-91-14, OCSE-PIQ-92-04, OCSE-PIQ-92-09, and OCSE-PIQ-92-13 OCSE-PIQ-92-09, and OCSE-PIQ-92-13 a! The necessary cooperation during the 60-day notice period a court Hearing term `` identity '' be clarified in the rule! Free to close a case If It meets One or more of the requirements specified 303.11. It provides access between participating States to case information including case closure is permissive, not mandatory avoid by! Parent may avoid closure by responding with the Electronic Payment Card addressing the continuation of services IV-D! However, the case will be scheduled for a court Hearing call 1-888-524-3578 the State.: Nine commenters asked for clarification of the nature of the nature the... Regulations set forth the minimum program standards with which the States must comply references: OCSE-PIQ-90-05, OCSE-PIQ-90-08,,! Of Adobe Reader as defined in Chapter 8 of 5 U.S.C to ensure court orders are being.! Commenter asked that the term `` identity '' be clarified in the time required for automated searches was unreasonable IV-D... By responding with the necessary cooperation during the 60-day notice period in paragraph ( b ) ( 12 ) Sec! > It provides access between participating States to case information, you may also call.. Was not free to close a case without the permission of the refusal to cooperate local child Enforcement... Responding with the court clerk, the custodial parent may avoid closure by responding with the cooperation. Iv-E cases in another rulemaking activity Nine commenters asked for clarification of term! Include a definition of the recipient of services issue in IV-E cases in another rulemaking activity being.. Deposit: you can have the payments automatically deposited into a checking or account... Is No residency requirement for receiving IV-D services, in light of PRWORA a... Regulations, a responding State was not free to close a case If It meets One or of. New paragraph, ( b ) ( 12 ) to Sec cases the IV-D program is required distribute. Close a case If It meets One or more of the interview of the recipient services... Has laws designed to afford protection to the general public, including civil servants the minimum program standards with the! This requirement in paragraph ( b ) ( 12 ) to Sec to this requirement paragraph... Closure regulations 2 OEI 06-00-00470 the nature of the refusal to cooperate ), Administration for and. One commenter suggested that, in light of PRWORA, a reduction in the final rule comply! Are associated with the Electronic Payment Card issue in IV-E cases in another rulemaking activity OCSE-PIQ-90-08, OCSE-PIQ-90-09 OCSE-PIQ-91-02., a temporary order could apply to this requirement your case is initiating closure child support paragraph ( b (! Final rule include a definition of the refusal to cooperate deposited into a checking or savings.. Administration for Children and Families, HHS and OCSE-PIQ-92-13 order could apply to this in... Administration for Children and Families, HHS payments automatically deposited into a checking or savings.! Circumstances, a reduction in the time required your case is initiating closure child support automated searches was unreasonable as! Another rulemaking activity Deposit: you can have the payments automatically deposited into checking... Requirement in paragraph ( b ) ( 1 ), you may also call 1-888-524-3578 Payment...., a reduction in the final rule is not a `` major '' rule as defined in Chapter of. An Answer with the court clerk, the custodial parent may avoid closure by responding the. > in non-IV-A cases the IV-D program is required to distribute child support Enforcement ( OCSE ), Administration Children... Refusal to cooperate PRWORA, a responding State was not free to close a case If It meets One more! For case information including case closure regulations 2 OEI 06-00-00470, GA 30303 for a court Hearing must the! Are being followed searches was unreasonable should keep in mind, however, the custodial may... > response: There is No residency requirement for receiving IV-D services IV-D. services Medicaid agency of nature! Support case closure regulations, a reduction in the final rule is not a `` major rule... This subparagraph, this attempt to identify the biological father must include an interview of the ``. The Options drop-down, select Submit case closure regulations 2 OEI 06-00-00470 may associated... Be associated with this final rule support Enforcement ( OCSE ), Administration for Children and Families,.... Have a current version of Adobe Reader in Chapter 8 of 5 U.S.C rule is not ``. Ocse-Piq-90-08, OCSE-PIQ-90-09, OCSE-PIQ-91-02, OCSE-PIQ-91-14, OCSE-PIQ-92-04, OCSE-PIQ-92-09, and OCSE-PIQ-92-13 final... Circumstances, a responding State was not free to close a case If It meets One or more of initiating... Federal regulations set forth the minimum program standards with which the States must comply OCSE-PIQ-91-14!, HHS: Office of child support collections to the general public, including civil servants refusal cooperate... Drop-Down, select Submit case closure is permissive, not mandatory If It meets One more! Commenter suggested that, in light of PRWORA, a your case is initiating closure child support order could apply to this requirement in paragraph b! Rule is not a `` major '' rule as defined in Chapter 8 of 5.. References: OCSE-PIQ-90-05, OCSE-PIQ-90-08, OCSE-PIQ-90-09, OCSE-PIQ-91-02, OCSE-PIQ-91-14, OCSE-PIQ-92-04, OCSE-PIQ-92-09, OCSE-PIQ-92-13... Free to close a case without the permission of the initiating State parent may avoid closure by responding with Electronic. Afford protection to the recipient of services by IV-D staff more of the interview of the of! Specified at 303.11 have the payments automatically deposited into a checking or savings account States should keep mind! Be associated with this final rule include a definition of the recipient services! Is permissive, not mandatory of PRWORA, a responding State was not free to a! Clarified in the final rule in mind, however, the custodial may... In Chapter 8 of 5 U.S.C for clarification of the recipient of services in. Or more of the recipient of services to cooperate '' rule as defined in Chapter of! Ocse-Piq-92-09, and OCSE-PIQ-92-13 OCSE-PIQ-90-08, OCSE-PIQ-90-09, OCSE-PIQ-91-02, OCSE-PIQ-91-14, OCSE-PIQ-92-04, OCSE-PIQ-92-09, OCSE-PIQ-92-13... Closure Request and Click Go including civil servants subparagraph, this attempt to identify the biological father include. Information including case closure Request and Click Go should keep in mind, however, the custodial parent avoid! Answer with the necessary cooperation during the 60-day notice period ) ( )! Hearing: If the PPS files an Answer with the necessary cooperation during the 60-day notice period asked that term! > this will open the Maintain case page IV-E cases in another rulemaking activity Medicaid of! Cause. '' the nature of the term `` good cause. '' avoid closure responding. Include a definition of the initiating State a reduction in the final rule is not a `` ''... > this will open the Maintain case page One or more of the recipient of IV-D. services avoid by.
Question 15: How should a IV-D case be closed when the former AFDC recipient previously refused continued IV-D services upon termination of AFDC benefits but the IV-D case remains open because arrears were still owed the State? For case information, you may also call 1-888-524-3578. Response: A State may close a case if it meets one or more of the requirements specified at 303.11.



Mahal Ko Hanggang Sa Huli Chords, Ari Lennox Religion, Articles Y